Analytics
Why NIW petitions fail
Updated with decisions published up to 2026-08-21. Numbers change as new decisions are added.
Appeals decided on the merits (sustained, remanded or dismissed) under the current three-prong test, from Dec 27, 2016.
Read these as patterns in denied cases, not approval odds. Every appeal here was first denied by USCIS; approved petitions never reach the appeals office. Tags are automated from decision text.
Free account
Draft your petition around these objections
Draft builds a petition letter outline from your case profile, with a list of the objections raised most often in your field to address before you file.
See it on a sample caseKey findings
- 32%
of these appeals failed on EB-2 eligibility: more than on any other part of the test.
- 25%
raised “Exceptional ability not established”, the most common objection.
Decisions per year
Sustained and remanded, % of decisions
Years with 5+ decisions
Which prong the AAO found not met
From the appeals office's own findings; a decision can fail more than one, and many stop at the first.
- Step 02232%
- Prong 1812%
What the Director's denial rested on
From the denial being appealed, as the decision reports it. 40 decisions don't say which part specifically.
- Step 02029%
- Prong 1913%
- Prong 269%
- Prong 334%
Most common objections
Share of decisions in scope where the objection was found. Click one for examples.
- 25%17 decisions
- 22%15 decisions
- 10%7 decisions
- 9%6 decisions
- 9%6 decisions
- 9%6 decisions
- 7%5 decisions
- 6%4 decisions
- 4%3 decisions
- 4%3 decisions
- 4%3 decisions
- 4%3 decisions
- 3%2 decisions
- 1%1 decisions
- 1%1 decisions
- 1%1 decisions
- 1%1 decisions
- 1%1 decisions
Evidence discussed: wins vs losses
% of sustained+remanded vs % of dismissed decisions that discuss each kind of evidence. Discussion is not proof it helped.
- Media50%12%
- Citations17%10%
- Peer review6%0%
- Publications11%8%
- Job creation11%10%
- STEM policy0%2%
- Support letters17%20%
- Business plan0%6%
- Government interest6%22%
- Awards6%26%
Outcomes by field
Sustained + remanded share, all fields (NIW merits appeals, post-Dhanasar)
- 6.4%1,458 decisions
- 12.8%523 decisions
- 11.1%423 decisions
- 10.8%408 decisions
- 12.7%197 decisions
- 8.6%152 decisions
- 8.1%111 decisions
- 37.9%95 decisions
- 17.0%88 decisions
- 26.5%68 decisions
- 9.1%55 decisions
- 26.9%52 decisions
- 10.0%40 decisions
- 9.7%31 decisions
Career stage mentioned
Sustained + remanded share
- Entrepreneur0.0%5 decisions
- Professor0.0%2 decisions
- Ph.D. student100.0%1 decisions
Authorities cited most
- Christo's4972%
- Chawathe4871%
- Dhanasar4566%
- USCIS Policy Manual3653%
- L-A-C-2334%
- NYSDOT913%
- R-A-M-913%
- M-P-812%
- Valdez812%
- Kazarian710%
- Burbano69%
- Ho69%
Countries named in NIW decisions
A name is not a nationality: it can be where the petitioner studied or worked, or part of the argument. Open a country to read the sentences.
Named most often
- 865decisions
- 103decisions
- 88decisions
- 70decisions
- 62decisions
- 58decisions
- 56decisions
- 52decisions
- 51decisions
- 46decisions
112 countries in all. Drag the globe to turn it; select a country to search for it.