Analytics
Why NIW petitions fail
Updated with decisions published up to 2026-08-21. Numbers change as new decisions are added.
Appeals decided on the merits (sustained, remanded or dismissed) under the current three-prong test, from Dec 27, 2016.
Read these as patterns in denied cases, not approval odds. Every appeal here was first denied by USCIS; approved petitions never reach the appeals office. Tags are automated from decision text.
Free account
Draft your petition around these objections
Draft builds a petition letter outline from your case profile, with a list of the objections raised most often in your field to address before you file.
See it on a sample caseKey findings
- 63%
of these appeals failed on Prong 1, merit and national importance: more than on any other part of the test.
- 59%
raised “Job creation or economic claims unsupported”, the most common objection.
Decisions per year
Sustained and remanded, % of decisions
Years with 5+ decisions
Which prong the AAO found not met
From the appeals office's own findings; a decision can fail more than one, and many stop at the first. 1 with unclear wording on a prong are left out of it.
- Step 03724%
- Prong 19563%
- Prong 2128%
- Prong 364%
What the Director's denial rested on
From the denial being appealed, as the decision reports it. 38 decisions don't say which part specifically.
- Step 06140%
- Prong 15939%
- Prong 22214%
- Prong 33422%
Most common objections
Share of decisions in scope where the objection was found. Click one for examples.
- 59%89 decisions
- 46%70 decisions
- 45%68 decisions
- 36%55 decisions
- 24%36 decisions
- 22%34 decisions
- 20%31 decisions
- 20%30 decisions
- 17%26 decisions
- 16%25 decisions
- 11%16 decisions
- 10%15 decisions
- 8%12 decisions
- 7%11 decisions
- 7%10 decisions
- 6%9 decisions
- 5%8 decisions
- 5%8 decisions
- 4%6 decisions
- 1%2 decisions
- 1%1 decisions
Evidence discussed: wins vs losses
% of sustained+remanded vs % of dismissed decisions that discuss each kind of evidence. Discussion is not proof it helped.
- Grants & funding8%0%
- Peer review8%0%
- STEM policy15%9%
- Citations8%7%
- Awards23%24%
- Media54%55%
- Patents0%2%
- Publications8%10%
- Business plan8%21%
- Government interest8%27%
- Support letters31%60%
- Job creation23%63%
Outcomes by field
Sustained + remanded share, all fields (NIW merits appeals, post-Dhanasar)
- 6.4%1,458 decisions
- 12.8%523 decisions
- 11.1%423 decisions
- 10.8%408 decisions
- 12.7%197 decisions
- 8.6%152 decisions
- 8.1%111 decisions
- 37.9%95 decisions
- 17.0%88 decisions
- 26.5%68 decisions
- 9.1%55 decisions
- 26.9%52 decisions
- 10.0%40 decisions
- 9.7%31 decisions
Career stage mentioned
Sustained + remanded share
- Entrepreneur0.0%12 decisions
- Professor0.0%8 decisions
- Ph.D. student0.0%1 decisions
- Postdoc0.0%1 decisions
Authorities cited most
- Chawathe14293%
- Dhanasar13689%
- Christo's13287%
- L-A-C-10569%
- USCIS Policy Manual8455%
- Caron2114%
- Ho2013%
- Kazarian1812%
- Burbano149%
- Katigbak149%
- E-M-117%
- M-P-107%
Countries named in NIW decisions
A name is not a nationality: it can be where the petitioner studied or worked, or part of the argument. Open a country to read the sentences.
Named most often
- 865decisions
- 103decisions
- 88decisions
- 70decisions
- 62decisions
- 58decisions
- 56decisions
- 52decisions
- 51decisions
- 46decisions
112 countries in all. Drag the globe to turn it; select a country to search for it.