Analytics
Why NIW petitions fail
Updated with decisions published up to 2026-08-21. Numbers change as new decisions are added.
Appeals decided on the merits (sustained, remanded or dismissed) under the current three-prong test, from Dec 27, 2016.
Read these as patterns in denied cases, not approval odds. Every appeal here was first denied by USCIS; approved petitions never reach the appeals office. Tags are automated from decision text.
Free account
Draft your petition around these objections
Draft builds a petition letter outline from your case profile, with a list of the objections raised most often in your field to address before you file.
See it on a sample caseKey findings
- 61%
of these appeals failed on Prong 1, merit and national importance: more than on any other part of the test.
- 50%
raised “Job creation or economic claims unsupported”, the most common objection.
Decisions per year
Sustained and remanded, % of decisions
Years with 5+ decisions
Which prong the AAO found not met
From the appeals office's own findings; a decision can fail more than one, and many stop at the first. 1 with unclear wording on a prong are left out of it.
- Step 067%
- Prong 15461%
- Prong 21922%
- Prong 367%
What the Director's denial rested on
From the denial being appealed, as the decision reports it. 37 decisions don't say which part specifically.
- Step 01011%
- Prong 12832%
- Prong 22023%
- Prong 32427%
Most common objections
Share of decisions in scope where the objection was found. Click one for examples.
- 50%44 decisions
- 47%41 decisions
- 31%27 decisions
- 26%23 decisions
- 24%21 decisions
- 23%20 decisions
- 19%17 decisions
- 18%16 decisions
- 17%15 decisions
- 13%11 decisions
- 13%11 decisions
- 11%10 decisions
- 9%8 decisions
- 7%6 decisions
- 6%5 decisions
- 6%5 decisions
- 6%5 decisions
- 6%5 decisions
- 3%3 decisions
- 3%3 decisions
- 3%3 decisions
Evidence discussed: wins vs losses
% of sustained+remanded vs % of dismissed decisions that discuss each kind of evidence. Discussion is not proof it helped.
- STEM policy20%15%
- Peer review20%18%
- Citations27%25%
- Grants & funding7%8%
- Patents0%4%
- Business plan27%32%
- Publications27%37%
- Awards0%15%
- Government interest13%34%
- Support letters47%77%
- Media33%67%
- Job creation20%71%
Outcomes by field
Sustained + remanded share, all fields (NIW merits appeals, post-Dhanasar)
- 6.4%1,458 decisions
- 12.8%523 decisions
- 11.1%423 decisions
- 10.8%408 decisions
- 12.7%197 decisions
- 8.6%152 decisions
- 8.1%111 decisions
- 37.9%95 decisions
- 17.0%88 decisions
- 26.5%68 decisions
- 9.1%55 decisions
- 26.9%52 decisions
- 10.0%40 decisions
- 9.7%31 decisions
Career stage mentioned
Sustained + remanded share
- Professor15.8%19 decisions
- Entrepreneur18.2%11 decisions
- Postdoc0.0%5 decisions
- Ph.D. student0.0%2 decisions
Authorities cited most
- Dhanasar8192%
- Chawathe7788%
- Christo's7585%
- L-A-C-4652%
- USCIS Policy Manual3439%
- NYSDOT1113%
- Ho1011%
- Katigbak910%
- Caron78%
- M-P-67%
- E-M-56%
- Burbano45%
Countries named in NIW decisions
A name is not a nationality: it can be where the petitioner studied or worked, or part of the argument. Open a country to read the sentences.
Named most often
- 865decisions
- 103decisions
- 88decisions
- 70decisions
- 62decisions
- 58decisions
- 56decisions
- 52decisions
- 51decisions
- 46decisions
112 countries in all. Drag the globe to turn it; select a country to search for it.