Analytics
Why NIW petitions fail
Updated with decisions published up to 2026-08-21. Numbers change as new decisions are added.
Appeals decided on the merits (sustained, remanded or dismissed) under the current three-prong test, from Dec 27, 2016.
Read these as patterns in denied cases, not approval odds. Every appeal here was first denied by USCIS; approved petitions never reach the appeals office. Tags are automated from decision text.
Free account
Draft your petition around these objections
Draft builds a petition letter outline from your case profile, with a list of the objections raised most often in your field to address before you file.
See it on a sample caseKey findings
- 72%
of these appeals failed on Prong 1, merit and national importance: more than on any other part of the test.
- 59%
raised “Job creation or economic claims unsupported”, the most common objection.
Decisions per year
Sustained and remanded, % of decisions
Years with 5+ decisions
Which prong the AAO found not met
From the appeals office's own findings; a decision can fail more than one, and many stop at the first. 12 with unclear wording on a prong are left out of it.
- Step 03910%
- Prong 129272%
- Prong 26616%
- Prong 392%
What the Director's denial rested on
From the denial being appealed, as the decision reports it. 169 decisions don't say which part specifically.
- Step 05113%
- Prong 115738%
- Prong 27819%
- Prong 39423%
Most common objections
Share of decisions in scope where the objection was found. Click one for examples.
- 59%239 decisions
- 48%194 decisions
- 38%154 decisions
- 33%133 decisions
- 22%89 decisions
- 18%73 decisions
- 17%68 decisions
- 17%68 decisions
- 16%67 decisions
- 14%56 decisions
- 13%54 decisions
- 12%49 decisions
- 11%45 decisions
- 10%42 decisions
- 10%40 decisions
- 9%37 decisions
- 9%35 decisions
- 8%31 decisions
- 7%28 decisions
- 3%12 decisions
- 2%10 decisions
- 2%8 decisions
Evidence discussed: wins vs losses
% of sustained+remanded vs % of dismissed decisions that discuss each kind of evidence. Discussion is not proof it helped.
- Peer review32%6%
- Citations41%19%
- Publications36%24%
- Grants & funding11%4%
- STEM policy18%12%
- Patents5%1%
- Awards9%12%
- Government interest14%20%
- Support letters45%59%
- Media36%70%
- Business plan9%45%
- Job creation16%70%
Outcomes by field
Sustained + remanded share, all fields (NIW merits appeals, post-Dhanasar)
- 6.4%1,458 decisions
- 12.8%523 decisions
- 11.1%423 decisions
- 10.8%408 decisions
- 12.7%197 decisions
- 8.6%152 decisions
- 8.1%111 decisions
- 37.9%95 decisions
- 17.0%88 decisions
- 26.5%68 decisions
- 9.1%55 decisions
- 26.9%52 decisions
- 10.0%40 decisions
- 9.7%31 decisions
Career stage mentioned
Sustained + remanded share
- Entrepreneur5.1%98 decisions
- Professor13.6%44 decisions
- Postdoc23.5%17 decisions
- Ph.D. student0.0%3 decisions
Authorities cited most
- Dhanasar34685%
- Chawathe32479%
- Christo's29071%
- L-A-C-24259%
- USCIS Policy Manual11227%
- NYSDOT7218%
- Caron4812%
- Katigbak4712%
- Izummi4712%
- E-M-4010%
- Ho379%
- Burbano236%
Countries named in NIW decisions
A name is not a nationality: it can be where the petitioner studied or worked, or part of the argument. Open a country to read the sentences.
Named most often
- 865decisions
- 103decisions
- 88decisions
- 70decisions
- 62decisions
- 58decisions
- 56decisions
- 52decisions
- 51decisions
- 46decisions
112 countries in all. Drag the globe to turn it; select a country to search for it.