PetitionLens
All decisions
SustainedEB-2 · Appeal

Provider of information technology services

Computing, AI & data · decided 2016-08-25 · NSC · AUG252016_01B5203

Official PDF on uscis.gov

Decided under the old NYSDOT test, replaced by Matter of Dhanasar on Dec 27, 2016. Useful for background only.

How each part of the test was decided

Read from the appeals office's own sentences by fixed rules, not from the Director's findings or the petitioner's arguments. Each result shows the sentence it came from. The official PDF controls.

  • Step 0Eligible for EB-2Not decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

The decision in brief

Sentences picked out of the text automatically. Read them in context below; the official PDF controls.

What the AAO decided

Read the full decision (1 page)

Objections found (0)

Automated tags. Each shows the sentence that triggered it.

No catalog objection was detected in the analysis section.

    Full decision

    OCR text from the official PDF, reformatted for reading. Scan errors carry over; the PDF controls.

    Highlighted: Outcome (2)Matter of X citation
    Decision header
    MATTER OF ERP A-, INC. · Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office · DATE: AUG. 25, 2016 · APPEAL OF NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER DECISION · PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER

    The Petitioner, a provider of information technology services, seeks to permanently employ the Beneficiary as a senior programmer analyst. It seeks classification of the Beneficiary as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree under the second preference immigrant category. See Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(2)(A), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2)(A). This classification allows a U.S. employer to sponsor a professional with an advanced degree for lawful permanent resident status.

    The Director, Nebraska Service Center, denied the petitiOn on July 22, 2015. The Director concluded that the record did not establish that the Beneficiary possessed the required education for the offered position.

    The matter is now before us on appeal. The Petitioner asserts that the Beneficiary is qualified for the offered position. Upon de novo review, we will sustain the appeal.

    Upon consideration of the entire record, including evidence submitted in response to our notice of intent to dismiss of March 16, 2016, the record establishes that the Beneficiary possesses the educational qualifications required for the offered position. We will therefore withdraw the Director's decision and sustain the appeal.

    The record otherwise establishes the eligibility of the Petitioner and the Beneficiary for the requested benefit. We will therefore also approve the petition.

    ORDER: The appeal is sustained.,

    Cite as Matter ofERPA-, Inc., ID# 16509 (AAO Aug. 25, 2016)