PetitionLens
Log inGet started
All decisions
DismissedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider

Business analyst

Business & finance · decided 2017-10-16 · NSC · OCT162017_01B5203

Official PDF on uscis.gov

How each part of the test was decided

Read from the appeals office's own sentences by fixed rules, not from the Director's findings or the petitioner's arguments. Each result shows the sentence it came from. The official PDF controls.

  • Step 0Eligible for EB-2Not decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

  • Prong 1Merit and national importanceNot decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

  • Prong 2Well positioned to advance itNot decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

  • Prong 3Worth waiving the job offerNot decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

The decision in brief

Sentences picked out of the text automatically. Read them in context below; the official PDF controls.

What the AAO decided

  • ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)( 1)(v). See in text
Read the full decision (1 page)

Objections found (1)

Automated tags. Each shows the sentence that triggered it.

  • Prong 2Support letters generic or unsupported
    However, the supplemental letter recites the procedural history for the petition, motions, and the appeal, and lists evidence. without specifically identifying an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the decision being appealed. See in text (p. 1)

Full decision

OCR text from the official PDF, reformatted for reading. Scan errors carry over; the PDF controls.

Highlighted: Outcome (1) Tagged objection (1)Matter of X citation
Decision header
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services · MATTER OF I-N-, INC. · Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office · DATE: OCT. 16, 2017 · APPEAL OF NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER DECISION · PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER

The Petitioner, a '·technical solutions provider,'' seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a business analyst. It requests classification of the Beneficiary as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree under the second preference immigrant classification. See Immigration and Nationality Act section 203(b)(2), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2). This employment-based immigrant classification allows a U.S. employer to sponsor a professional with an advanced degree for lawful permanent resident status.

The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition and affirmed the denial in response to a subsequent motion to reopen and a motion to reconsider. The matter is now before us on appeal. Upon review, we will summarily dismiss the appeal.

An officer to whom an appeal is taken shall summarily dismiss any appeal when the party concerned fails to identify specifically an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)(1)(v).

The Petitioner did not provide a statement in support of the appeal that specifically identifies an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the decision being appealed. We received a letter and evidence submitted to supplement the appeal filing. However, the supplemental letter recites the procedural history for the petition, motions, and the appeal, and lists evidence. without specifically identifying an erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the decision being appealed.Support letters generic or unsupported

Because the Petitioner has not identified a specific, erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact in the Director's decision below, the appeal must be summarily dismissed.

ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.F.R. § 103.3(a)( 1)(v). Cite as Matter o.ll-N-. Inc., ID# 925740 (AAO Oct. 16, 2017)