21 decisions for “"Russia"”

nationally important, the appeal brief focuses on the Petitioner's past achievements in Russia, the general need for more DIRFloortime providers in her planned location…larger non-profit social project similar to what [the Petitioner] achieved in Russia." While the record has evidence, such as the business plan and the Petitioner's statement

advanced degree, the Petitioner initially submitted his diploma from a university in Russia, a transcript, his resume, and certificates for his completion of English language courses. While…record, the Petitioner received a diploma in 2011 from theI Iin Russia for the qualification of"Manager." A transcript shows the following history of the Petitioner's education

support show that he "worked on large-scale petrochemical and manufacturing operations" in Russia, but they do not demonstrate that his proposed endeavor in the United States would

experience and skills in the record consist of working in I I Russia, for. ________. (a network of beauty salons) as an administrator and.__ _____.(a natural stone supplier

ofArts Degree in Economics" from the Federal National State-Funded Educational Institution in Russia. However, the associated transcript for this degree states she enrolled in the program

asserted was recovering from the COVID-19 pandemic and the war between Russia and Ukraine. The Petitioner farther stated that her consulting services would contribute to job creation

classifies the Petitioner's letters of recommendation from her work associates in Russia as being from "industry leaders" but does not provide evidence to explain or support this

elaboration on these three prongs. 2 [p3] Petitioner's diploma from in Russia, awarded in June 2011, she had a foreign equivalent degree to a U.S. advanced degree

United States. Id. II. ANALYSIS The Petitioner, a citizen and national of Russia residing in the United States, seeks to establish an independent business in the field

professionals in the oil and gas and capital market sector in Russia" and is a, "leading figure in the Russian oil & gas market." A former colleague describes

business contracts, and a magazine interview describing his work for a company in Russia. The Petitioner does not explain how this evidence is relevant to national importance

states that from 2014 to 2018 she worked as a private tutor in Russia, and from 2018 to 2021 she worked in the United States

specialist as an attorney issued on July 10, 2014, froml !University in Russia, meets the criteria at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(ii)(A). This criterion requires

organization called the~------------~and evidence of her registration as an "individual entrepreneur" in Russia. These documents do not describe the proposed endeavor nor help establish its potential prospective

Petitioner claims that the "rise in tension between the United States and Russia" has resulted in an increased need for Russian-speaking professionals like the Petitioner

record which would permit us to evaluate the duties a business consultant in Russia would perform for the salary and remuneration the Petitioner presents as a point

corporate registration documents and licenses related to his general contracting company in Russia. The Director found that while the Petitioner's endeavor had substantial merit, the record didn

well as gratitude letters from a company for whom she provided services in Russia. The Director determined that the initial evidence was insufficient to demonstrate that that

tech, and art companies. 3 [p4] Using her knowledge and experience gained in Russia and France, [the Petitioner] has developed her own system ofIP audit, which has been

forwarded throughout other gas projects such as projects awarded in Norway, Malaysia, UAE, Russia, and Brunei. In support, the Petitioner submitted numerous documents from his employer,! lindicating