39 decisions
newest first- DismissedEB-2 · Appeal2026-04-10UniversityAPR102026_02B5203Arts, media & sports
But SCOPS concluded that the Petitioner did not demonstrate the Beneficiary's qualifications for designation as an alien of "exceptional ability" under the U.
Evidence submitted too lateNo interest from users, customers or investors - MotionEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2025-05-13Mechanic specializing in trucks and heavy machineryMAY132025_03B5203Aviation & transport
Service Center Operations (SCOPS) denied the petition, concluding the Petitioner did not establish that he satisfies at least three of the ten regulatory criteria at 8 C.
Claims not backed by documents - MotionEB-2 · Motion to reopen2023-09-18Provider of information technology consulting servicesSEP182023_03B5203Computing, AI & data
On remand, the Director again revoked the petition's approval, finding that the Petitioner did not demonstrate the Beneficiary's qualifying experience for the job.
Inconsistencies in the recordSupport letters generic or unsupported - RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2023-06-05Provider of software development and consulting servicesJUN052023_03B5203Computing, AI & data
We will therefore withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of new decision.
- DismissedEB-2 · Appeal2023-03-27E-commerce business specializing in musical instruments and suppliesMAR272023_01B5203Business & finance
The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish that the Beneficiary is qualified for the offered position because she does not meet the experience requirements stated on the labor certification.
- DismissedEB-2 · Motion to reopen2023-03-02Provider of information technology (IT) consulting servicesMAR022023_01B5203Computing, AI & data
On remand, the Director again revoked the petition's approval, this time concluding that the Petitioner did not demonstrate the Beneficiary's qualifying experience for the job.
Inconsistencies in the record - DismissedEB-2 · Appeal2023-02-16Provider of management services for clinical trialsFEB162023_01B5203Business & finance
The Director concluded that the Petitioner did not demonstrate the Beneficiary's qualifying experience for the offered position, or her qualifying education for the job or the requested immigrant visa category.
Inconsistencies in the record - MotionEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2022-09-12Occupation not statedSEP122022_01B5203Arts, media & sports
First, the Director concluded that the Petitioner did not establish that the Beneficiary was an individual of exceptional ability because it did not demonstrate that the Beneficiary's work experience in the last 12 months required, or that the intended work in the United States will require, exceptional ability.
Claims not backed by documentsNot eligible at the time of filingExceptional ability not establishedInconsistencies in the record - UnknownEB-2 · Certification2022-06-03Software engineerJUN032022_01B5203Computing, AI & data
The Director concluded that the Petitioner did not demonstrate its required ability to pay the combined proffered wages of this and other Form 1-140 petitions.
Inconsistencies in the record - MotionEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider2022-01-27Distributor of used clothingJAN272022_01B5203Other / unclear
DepartmentofLabor (DOL) does not establish the job's need for an advanced degree professional.
Citation record not persuasiveInconsistencies in the record - RemandedEB-2 · Motion to reconsider2021-08-25Occupation not statedAUG252021_02B5203Clinical & health
Upon de nova review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new 1 I.
Inconsistencies in the record - DismissedEB-2 · Appeal2021-06-24Provider of information technology (IT) and engineering staffJUN242021_01B5203Computing, AI & data
The Director concluded that the Petitioner did not demonstrate the Beneficiary's possession ofthe minimum experiencerequired for the offered position.
- RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2021-05-17State universityMAY172021_01B5203Education
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the case for further consideration and the issuance of a new decision.
- RemandedEB-2 · Motion to reconsider2021-01-05Developer of software for online advertisingJAN052021_02B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de nova review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Inconsistencies in the recordLabor certification not shown to be impractical - RemandedEB-2 · Certification2020-10-01Assistant professorOCT012020_04B5203Education
Upon de nova review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter to the Director for further consideration and entry of a new decision.
- RemandedEB-2 · Certification2020-09-03Assistant professorSEP032020_04B5203Education
Upon de nova review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter to the Director for further consideration and entry of a new decision.
- DismissedEB-2 · Certification2020-07-10Physical therapistJUL102020_04B5203Clinical & health
The Director concluded that the Petitioner did not demonstrate: the Beneficiary's qualifications for the offered position or the required immigrant visa classification; the company's intention to employ the Beneficiary in the geographic area of intended employment; or the company's ability to pay the position's proffered wage.
Citation record not persuasiveFive years of progressive experience not documentedInconsistencies in the record - DismissedEB-2 · Appeal2020-02-06Marketing analystFEB062020_01B5203Business & finance
The Director concluded that the Petitioner did not demonstrate the Beneficiary's possession of the minimum employment experience required for the offered position.
Inconsistencies in the record - DismissedEB-2 · Certification2020-02-06Software engineerFEB062020_02B5203Computing, AI & data
The Director concluded that the Petitioner did not demonstrate the Beneficiary's possession of a bachelor's degree in the field of study required by the offered position.
Inconsistencies in the record - RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2019-03-26Provider of network computing products and servicesMAR262019_01B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de nova review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following opinion.