373 decisions
newest first- DismissedEB-2 · Appeal2026-07-07Information technology consulting companyJUL072026_01B5203Computing, AI & data
The Acting Associate Director of Service Center Operations concluded that the Petitioner did not demonstrate its required ability to pay the offered job's proffered wage.
Claims not backed by documents - RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2026-06-03Software development companyJUN032026_02B5203Computing, AI & data
We will therefore withdraw SCOPS' decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
- RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2026-05-27Semiconductor manufacturerMAY272026_03B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
- RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2026-04-28Developer of electrical weapons and body camerasAPR282026_02B5203Computing, AI & data
We will therefore withdraw SCOPS' decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
- RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2026-03-11QA automation testerMAR112026_02B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Five years of progressive experience not documented - RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2025-12-18EngineerDEC182025_01B5203Engineering
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalent - RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2025-11-20EngineerNOV202025_03B5203Engineering
Because SCOPS applied the incorrect classification to the petition, we will withdraw the decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision.
- DismissedEB-2 · Appeal2025-09-17Software development and consultancy businessSEP172025_02B5203Computing, AI & data
Service Center Operations (SCOPS) denied the petition, concluding that the Petitioner did not establish that the Beneficiary possessed the required education for the offered position as described on the accompanying certification from the U.
- DismissedEB-2 · Appeal2025-03-25Occupation not statedMAR252025_06B5203Computing, AI & data
After reviewing the documentation in the record, the Chief denied the petition on multiple grounds, including on the ground that the Petitioner did not demonstrate the JCE will likely create at least 10 jobs for each investor seeking EB-5 classification.
Job creation or economic claims unsupportedTried to change the endeavor after filingNo interest from users, customers or investorsPlan or projections not corroborated - DismissedEB-2 · Appeal2024-12-02Pulp and paper companyDEC022024_01B5203Computing, AI & data
The Director concluded that the Petitioner did not demonstrate the Beneficiary's qualifying experience for the offered job.
- DismissedEB-2 · Appeal2024-09-09Information technology solutions providerSEP092024_03B5203Computing, AI & data
The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition, concluding the record did not establish that the Beneficiary possessed a baccalaureate degree or its foreign equivalent as required to be eligible as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree.
Degree not shown to be a U.S. advanced degree equivalentFive years of progressive experience not documented - DismissedEB-2 · Appeal2024-09-04Software design and development providerSEP042024_01B5203Computing, AI & data
- RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2024-05-23Professional staffing agencyMAY232024_01B5203Computing, AI & data
On appeal, we withdrew the Director's decision and remanded the matter for further consideration.
- DismissedEB-2 · Appeal2024-03-27Information technology solutions providerMAR272024_03B5203Computing, AI & data
The Director of the Nebraska Service Center denied the petition, concluding that the record did not establish that the Beneficiary possesses the minimum requirements for the offered position as stated on the labor certification.
Not eligible at the time of filingInconsistencies in the recordLabor certification not shown to be impractical - RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2023-09-27Computer software engineerSEP272023_01B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
- MotionEB-2 · Motion to reopen2023-09-18Provider of information technology consulting servicesSEP182023_03B5203Computing, AI & data
On remand, the Director again revoked the petition's approval, finding that the Petitioner did not demonstrate the Beneficiary's qualifying experience for the job.
Inconsistencies in the recordSupport letters generic or unsupported - RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2023-08-23Computer software engineerAUG232023_01B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de novo review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Not eligible at the time of filing - RemandedEB-2 · Motion to reopen2023-07-21Software development companyJUL212023_01B5203Computing, AI & data
[p2] the motion to reopen, withdraw the Director's decision, and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Five years of progressive experience not documentedInconsistencies in the record - RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2023-06-05Provider of software development and consulting servicesJUN052023_03B5203Computing, AI & data
We will therefore withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of new decision.
- RemandedEB-2 · Appeal2023-03-08Information technology businessMAR082023_01B5203Computing, AI & data
Upon de nova review, we will withdraw the Director's decision and remand the matter for entry of a new decision consistent with the following analysis.
Inconsistencies in the recordTried to change the endeavor after filing