PetitionLens
All decisions
SustainedEB-2 · Appeal

Occupation not stated

Other / unclear · decided 2014-02-10 · TSC · FEB102014_01B5203

Official PDF on uscis.gov

Decided under the old NYSDOT test, replaced by Matter of Dhanasar on Dec 27, 2016. Useful for background only.

How each part of the test was decided

Read from the appeals office's own sentences by fixed rules, not from the Director's findings or the petitioner's arguments. Each result shows the sentence it came from. The official PDF controls.

  • Step 0Eligible for EB-2Not decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

The decision in brief

Sentences picked out of the text automatically. Read them in context below; the official PDF controls.

What the AAO decided

  • ORDER: The appeal is sustained. See in text
  • The prior decision of the director is withdrawn and the appeal is sustained. See in text
  • The petition is approved. See in text

Main reasons given

  • Based on a review of the record, including the materials submitted on appeal and in response to the AAO's request for evidence, the AAO finds that the petitioner has established that the beneficiary's qualifications meet the requirements of the labor certification and that the petition merits approval as a second preference advanced degree professional. 1 Section 203(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) states in pertinent part that: (2) Aliens Who Are Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Aliens of Exceptional Ability.-- See in text
Read the full decision (3 pages)

Objections found (0)

Automated tags. Each shows the sentence that triggered it.

No catalog objection was detected in the analysis section.

    Full decision

    OCR text from the official PDF, reformatted for reading. Scan errors carry over; the PDF controls.

    Highlighted: Outcome (5) AAO finding (1)Matter of X citation
    Decision header
    DATE: FEB 1 0 2014 · INRE: Petitioner: · Beneficiary: · OFFICE: TEXAS SERVICE CENTER U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., MS 2090 Washington, DC 20529-2090 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services · PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Member of the Professions Holding an Advanced

    Degree or an Alien of Exceptional Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b )(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2)

    ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER:

    INSTRUCTIONS:

    Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) in your case. This is a non­ precedent decision. The AAO does not announce new constructions of law nor establish agency policy through non-precedent decisions.

    I

    , n Rosenberg

    Chief, Administrative Appeals Office www.uscis.gov

    DISCUSSION: The Director, Texas Service Center, denied the immigrant visa petition on November 14, 2012. The matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO). The appeal will be sustained. The petition will be approved.

    The petitioner describes itself as an IT consulting finn. It seeks to employ the beneficiary permanently in the United States as a systems analyst. As required by statute, an ETA Form 9089, Application for Permanent Employment Certification approved by the Department of Labor (DOL), accompanied the petition.

    The director denied the petition on November 14, 2012 concluding that the petitioner had failed to establish that the beneficiary possessed the education as required by the terms of the labor certification. The petitioner filed an appeal, asserting the that the beneficiary's credentials satisfied the terms of the labor certification.

    The AAO conducts appellate review on a de novo basis . The AAO's de novo authority is well recognized by the federal courts. See Soltane v. DOl, 381 F.3d 143, 145 (3d Cir. 2004). Based on a review of the record, including the materials submitted on appeal and in response to the AAO's request for evidence, the AAO finds that the petitioner has established that the beneficiary's qualifications meet the requirements of the labor certification and that the petition merits approval as a second preference advanced degree professional. 1 Section 203(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) states in pertinent part that: (2) Aliens Who Are Members of the Professions Holding Advanced Degrees or Aliens of Exceptional Ability.--

    (A) In General. -- Visas shall be made available ... to qualified immigrants who are members of the professions holding advanced degrees or their equivalent or who because of their exceptional ability in the sciences, arts, or business, will substantially benefit prospectively the national economy, cultural or educational interests , or welfare of the United States, and whose services in the sciences, arts, professions, or business are sought by an employer in the United States.

    In pertinent part, section 203(b )(2) of the Act provides immigrant classification to members of the professions holding advanced degrees or their equivalent and whose services are sought by an employer in the United States. An advanced degree is a United States academic or professional degree or a foreign equivalent degree above the baccalaureate level. 8 C.F .R. § 204.5(k)(2). The regulation further states: "A United States baccalaureate degree or a foreign equivalent degree followed by at least five years of progressive experience in the specialty shall be considered the equivalent of a master's degree. If a doctoral degree is customarily required by the specialty, the alien must have a United States doctorate or a foreign equivalent degree." /d.

    The burden of proof in these proceedings rests solely with the petitioner. The petitioner has met that burden. Section 291 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1361.

    ORDER: The appeal is sustained. The prior decision of the director is withdrawn and the appeal is sustained. The petition is approved.