PetitionLens
All decisions
SustainedEB-2 · Appeal

Senior software engineer

Computing, AI & data · decided 2022-12-14 · NSC · DEC142022_02B5203

Official PDF on uscis.gov

How each part of the test was decided

Read from the appeals office's own sentences by fixed rules, not from the Director's findings or the petitioner's arguments. Each result shows the sentence it came from. The official PDF controls.

  • Step 0Eligible for EB-2Not decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

  • Prong 1Merit and national importanceNot decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

  • Prong 2Well positioned to advance itNot decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

  • Prong 3Worth waiving the job offerNot decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

The decision in brief

Sentences picked out of the text automatically. Read them in context below; the official PDF controls.

What the AAO decided

Read the full decision (3 pages)

Objections found (2)

Automated tags. Each shows the sentence that triggered it.

  • In response to the NOIR, the Petitioner submitted a letter from a company official indicating that, since the labor certification's issuance, the company promoted the Beneficiary in a normal progression of employment and without material change in the job duties. See in text (p. 2)
  • Here, the Petitioner demonstrated that the job duties of the offered position vary only slightly from those certified by DOL, and, therefore, the 10% discrepancy does not, in the facts presented in this case, result in a material change to the position. See in text (p. 3)

Full decision

OCR text from the official PDF, reformatted for reading. Scan errors carry over; the PDF controls.

Highlighted: Outcome (2) Tagged objection (2)Matter of X citation
Decision header
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services · In Re: 23474869 · Appeal of Nebraska Service Center Decision · Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office · Date: DEC. 14, 2022 · Form 1-140, Immigrant Petition for Advanced Degree Professional

The Petitioner seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a senior software engineer under the second- preference, immigrant classification for members of the professions with advanced degrees or their equivalents. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(2)(A), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2)(A).

After initially approving the petition, the Director of the Nebraska Service Center revoked the petition's approval, concluding that the accompanying certification from the U.S. Department ofLabor (DOL) does not describe the offered position.

In these proceedings, it is the Petitioner's burden to establish eligibility for the requested benefit by a preponderance ofthe evidence. Section 291 ofthe Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1361; Matter ofChawathe, 25 I&N Dec. 369, 375 (AAO 2010). The Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) reviews the questions in this matter de novo. See Matter ofChristo 's Inc., 26 I&N Dec. 537, 537 n.2 (AAO 2015). Upon de novo review, we will sustain the appeal.

Immigration as an advanced degree professional generally follows a three-step process. To permanently fill a position in the United States with a foreign worker, a prospective employer must first obtain certification from the U.S. Department ofLabor (DOL). See section 212(a)(5) ofthe Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1182(a)(5). DOL approval signifies that insufficient U.S. workers are able, willing, qualified, and available for a position. Id. Labor certification also indicates that the employment of a foreign national will not harm wages and working conditions o f U.S. workers with similar jobs. Id.

If DOL approves a position, an employer must next submit the certified labor application with an immigrant visa petition to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS). See section 204 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1154. Among other things, USCIS considers whether a beneficiary meets the requirementsofacertifiedpositionandarequestedimmigrantvisaclassification. IfUSCISapproves the petition, a foreign national may finally apply for an immigrant visa abroad or, if eligible, adjustment of status in the United States. See section 245 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1255.

At any time before a beneficiary obtains lawful permanent residence, however, USCIS may revoke a petition's approval for "good and sufficient cause." Section 205 of the Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1155. If p. 2 supported by the record, a petition's erroneous approval may justify its revocation. Matter ofHo, 19 I&N Dec. 582, 590 (BIA 1988). Unless accompanied by an application for Schedule A designation or documentation of a beneficiary's qualifications in a shortage occupation, a petition for a professional must include a valid, individual labor certification. 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(1)(3)(i). A labor certification remains valid only for the particular job opportunity, foreign national, and geographic area of intended employment stated on it. 20 C.F.R. § 656.30(c)(2). If a job opportunity changes during a petition's pendency, the accompanying labor certification may no longer be valid. Matter of United Inv. Grp., 19 I&N Dec. 248, 249 (Comm'r 1984).

For a job offer to remain as DOL-certified, "the facts of employment or intended employment must remain as stated and the specific employer-employee relationship stipulated and intended must continue both in present fact and prospectively." Id. USCIS must assess whether "there has been any other material change in the job opportunity covered by the original labor certification." 6 USCIS Policy Manual E.6(D), https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual.

Here, the accompanying labor certification identifies the offered position as "Software Engineer III" and lists the following job duties: Develop and implement software to contribute to the v1s10n and design of search, browse, and category pages for desktop and mobile properties. Enhance and maintain the Preso and Polaris search backend microservice software in Java. Designandimplementsearchbackendcomponentsinamassivelyscalable,high performance, multi-tenant system in the Tomcat or Jetty platform running on Java. Gather requirements for products and design, develop, test, and support the software applications. Uphold the overall codebase quality by participating in software design review, code review, and technical discussions. Develop and write unit-test and regression test cases for new software features and enhancements. Release features to production and execute the release procedures to ensure that new features are available to end-users. Provide technical support for day-to-day production or business issues.

The Director issued a written notice of intent to revoke (NOIR) the petition's approval, noting that the petition identifies the offered position by a different job title, "Senior Software Engineer." The Petitioner's support letter submitted with the petition states that senior software engineer is the "normal progression in employment from the role listed on the certified ETA Form 9089" and lists the same job duties. But the Director stated that the letter "was not sufficient evidence to justify the difference ofjob titles listed on Form 1-140 and ETA Form 9089."

In response to the NOIR, the Petitioner submitted a letter from a company official indicating that, since the labor certification's issuance, the company promoted the Beneficiary in a normal progression of employment and without material change in the job duties.Tried to change the endeavor after filing The official provided a comparison of the job duties of both positions and the percentage of time spent on each duty.

The Director determined that the Petitioner no longer offers the Beneficiary the same pos1t10n described on the labor certification. The Director calculated that the Beneficiary spends 90% of the p. 3 time on the same job duties. He concluded that this demonstrates that the positions "are different in nature" and that the petition is not supported by a labor certification for the specific position. Here, the Petitioner demonstrated that the job duties of the offered position vary only slightly from those certified by DOL, and, therefore, the 10% discrepancy does not, in the facts presented in this case, result in a material change to the position.Inconsistencies in the record Contrary to the Director's decision, we therefore conclude that the changes in the offered position's job duties are not material. We will therefore sustain the appeal and reinstate the petition's approval.

ORDER: The appeal is sustained.