PetitionLens
All decisions
SustainedEB-2 · Appeal

Provider of computer software engineering services

Computing, AI & data · decided 2018-12-04 · TSC · DEC042018_01B5203

Official PDF on uscis.gov

How each part of the test was decided

Read from the appeals office's own sentences by fixed rules, not from the Director's findings or the petitioner's arguments. Each result shows the sentence it came from. The official PDF controls.

  • Step 0Eligible for EB-2Not decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

  • Prong 1Merit and national importanceNot decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

  • Prong 2Well positioned to advance itNot decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

  • Prong 3Worth waiving the job offerNot decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

The decision in brief

Sentences picked out of the text automatically. Read them in context below; the official PDF controls.

What the AAO decided

Read the full decision (1 page)

Objections found (0)

Automated tags. Each shows the sentence that triggered it.

No catalog objection was detected in the analysis section.

    Full decision

    OCR text from the official PDF, reformatted for reading. Scan errors carry over; the PDF controls.

    Highlighted: Outcome (1)Matter of X citation
    Decision header
    U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services · MATTER OF M-D-T-, INC. · APPEAL OF TEXAS SERVICE CENTER DECISION

    Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office DATE: DEC. 4, 2018

    PETITION: FORM 1-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER The Petitioner, a provider of computer software engineering services, seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a senior software developer. It requests her classification under the second-preference, immigrant category as a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act) section 203(b)(2)(A), 8 U.S.C. § 1I53(b)(2)(A). This employment-based, "EB-2" category allows a U.S. business to sponsor a foreign national for lawful permanent resident status to work in a position requiring at least a master's degree, or a bachelor's degree followed by five years of experience.'

    The Director of the Texas Service Center denied the petition. Although the Beneficiary's foreign degree equates to a U.S. master's degree as required by the labor certification,1 the Director found that the Petitioner did not establish the Beneficiary's possession of a degree in a field of study acceptable for the offered position. On appeal, the Petitioner submits additional evidence and asserts that the Beneficiary's foreign degree equates to the required degree in an acceptable field ofstudy.

    Upon de novo review, including thorough consideration of the educational documents submitted, we find that a preponderance of evidence establishes the Beneficiary's possession of a fixeign equivalent of the required degree in an acceptable field of study. Thus, the record on appeal establishes the Beneficiary's possession of the educational requirements of the offered position.

    ORDER: The appeal is sustained.

    Cite as Malter <?fM-D-T-, Inc., ID# 1987893 (AAO Dec. 4,2018) The labor certification alternatively allows a U.S. bachelor's degree followed by five years of post-baccalaureate experience. The labor certification also permits a foreign educational equivalent.