PetitionLens
Log inGet started
All decisions
MotionEB-2 · Appeal

Business providing software consulting services

Computing, AI & data · decided 2015-12-02 · TSC · DEC022015_01B5203

Official PDF on uscis.gov

Decided under the old NYSDOT test, replaced by Matter of Dhanasar on Dec 27, 2016. Useful for background only.

How each part of the test was decided

Read from the appeals office's own sentences by fixed rules, not from the Director's findings or the petitioner's arguments. Each result shows the sentence it came from. The official PDF controls.

  • Step 0Eligible for EB-2Not decided

    No finding on this in the appeals office's own words.

The decision in brief

Sentences picked out of the text automatically. Read them in context below; the official PDF controls.

What the AAO decided

  • ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.P.R.§ 103.3(a)(l)(v). See in text
Read the full decision (1 page)

Objections found (0)

Automated tags. Each shows the sentence that triggered it.

No catalog objection was detected in the analysis section.

    Full decision

    OCR text from the official PDF, reformatted for reading. Scan errors carry over; the PDF controls.

    Highlighted: Outcome (1)Matter of X citation
    Decision header
    U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services · MATTER OF V-, INC · APPEAL OF TEXAS SERVICE CENTER DECISION · Non-Precedent Decision of the Administrative Appeals Office · DATE: DEC. 2, 2015 · PETITION: FORM I-140, IMMIGRANT PETITION FOR ALIEN WORKER

    The Petitioner, a business providing software consulting services, seeks to employ the Beneficiary as a software engineer under classification as an advanced degree professional. See section 203(b )(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2). The Director, Texas Service Center, denied the petition. The matter is now before us on appeal. The appeal will be summarily dismissed.

    Pursuant to 8 C.P.R.§ 103.3(a)(1)(v), an appeal shall be summarily dismissed ifthe party concerned fails to identify specifically any erroneous conclusion of law or statement of fact for the appeal. In a June 15, 2015 letter accompanying the Form I-290B, the Petitioner offers no reason for the filing of the appeal, but states only that a brief and "any accompanying additional evidence" will be provided within 30 days. As of this date, we have received nothing further from the Petitioner and regulation requires that any brief be submitted directly to this office. 8 C.P.R. §§ 103.3(a)(2)(vii), (viii).

    Therefore, as the Petitioner has not identified the basis on which it is appealing the Director's decision, the Form I-290B in this matter must be summarily dismissed.'

    ORDER: The appeal is summarily dismissed pursuant to 8 C.P.R.§ 103.3(a)(l)(v).

    Cite as Matter ofV-, Inc, ID# 15510 (AAO Dec. 2, 2015)