PetitionLens
All decisions
RemandedEB-2 · Motion to reopen & reconsider

Occupation not stated

Other / unclear · decided 2013-08-02 · NSC · AUG022013_03B5203

Official PDF on uscis.gov

Decided under the old NYSDOT test, replaced by Matter of Dhanasar on Dec 27, 2016. Useful for background only.

How each part of the test was decided

Read from the appeals office's own sentences by fixed rules, not from the Director's findings or the petitioner's arguments. Each result shows the sentence it came from. The official PDF controls.

  • Step 0Eligible for EB-2Not decided
    The Director's denial rested on this
    The director held that the language provided in the provision in H.14 that experience or training "evaluated as equivalent to a U.S. bachelor's degree" would be accepted meant that the petition does not qualify for advanced degree professional classification. p. 4

The decision in brief

Sentences picked out of the text automatically. Read them in context below; the official PDF controls.

Summary sentence

As the petitioner has not had an opportunity to address the issue related to the sponsorship of multiple beneficiaries or whether the beneficiary's degree is in one of the subjects required by the terms of the labor certification, we will remand the petition back to the director to allow the petitioner to address these issues.

What the AAO decided

Read the full decision (5 pages)

Objections found (0)

Automated tags. Each shows the sentence that triggered it.

No catalog objection was detected in the analysis section.

    Full decision

    OCR text from the official PDF, reformatted for reading. Scan errors carry over; the PDF controls.

    Highlighted: Outcome (1)Matter of X citation
    Decision header
    DATEAUG 0 2 2013 OFFICE: NEBRASKA SERVICE CENTER · INRE: Petitioner: · Beneficiary: U.S. Department of Homeland Security U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) 20 Massachusetts Ave., N.W., MS 2090 Washington , DC 20529-2090 U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services FILE: · PETITION: Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker as a Member of the Professions Holding an Advanced

    Degree or an Alien of Exceptional Ability Pursuant to Section 203(b )(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2)

    ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER:

    SELF REPRESENTED

    INSTRUCTIONS:

    Enclosed please find the decision of the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) in your case. This is a non-precedent decision. The AAO does not announce new constructions of law nor establish agency policy through non-precedent decisions. If you believe the AAO incorrectly applied current law or policy to your case or if you seek to present new facts for consideration, you may file a motion to reconsider or a motion to reopen, respectively. Any motion must be filed on a Notice of Appeal or Motion (Form I-290B) within 33 days of the date of this decision. Please review the Form I-290B instructions at http://www.uscis.gov/forms for the latest information on fee, filing location, and other requirements. See also 8 C.P.R.§ 103.5. Do not file a motion directly with the AAO.

    Thank you,

    Ron Rosenberg

    Acting Chief, Administrative Appeals Office www.uscis.gov

    DISCUSSION: The Director, Nebraska Service Center, denied the immigrant visa petition and the petitioner filed a motion to reopen the denial, which was also denied. The matter is now before the Administrative Appeals Office (AAO) on appeal. The director's October 22, 2012 decision will be withdrawn. The petition will be remanded.

    The petitioner describes itself as a software development and consulting firm. It seeks to permanently employ the beneficiary in the United States as a business systems analyst. On the Form I-140, Immigrant Petition for Alien Worker, the petitioner requested classification of the beneficiary as an advanced degree professional pursuant to section 203(b )(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (the Act), 8 U.S.C. § 1153(b)(2).

    As required by statute, the petition is accompanied by an ETA Form 9089, Application for Permanent Employment Certification (labor certification), approved by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL).

    The director's decision denying the petition concluded that the petition cannot be approved because the labor certification does not require a member of the professions holding an advanced degree. On appeal, the petitioner states that it would only hire an individual with an advanced degree or an acceptable equivalent for the proffered position. The petitioner states that the proffered position is extremely complex and that only those persons with the equivalent of a master's degree or bachelor's degree with five years of experience would be qualified for the position.

    The appeal is properly filed and makes a specific allegation of error in law or fact. The AAO conducts appellate review on a de novo basis.1 The AAO considers all pertinent evidence in the record, including new evidence properly submitted upon appeal? A petition that fails to comply with the technical requirements of the law may be denied by the AAO even if the director does not identify all of the grounds for denial in the initial decision.3 The procedural history in this case is documented by the record and incorporated into the decision. Further elaboration of the procedural history will be made only as necessary.

    Section 203(b )(2) of the Act provides immigrant classification to members of the professions holding advanced degrees or aliens of exceptional ability, whose services are sought by an employer-in the United States. See also 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(l).

    The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(2) defines the terms "advanced degree" and "profession." An "advanced degree" is defined as:

    [A]ny United States academic or professional degree or a foreign equivalent degree above that of baccalaureate. A United States baccalaureate degree or a foreign equivalent degree followed by at least five years of progressive experience in the specialty shall be considered the equivalent of a master's degree. If a doctoral degree is customarily required by the specialty, the alien must have a United States doctorate or a foreign equivalent degree

    A "profession" is defined as "one of the occupations listed in section 101(a)(32) of the Act, as well as any occupation for which a United States baccalaureate degree or its foreign equivalent is the minimum requirement for entry into the occupation." The occupations listed at section 101(a)(32) of the Act are "architects, engineers, lawyers, physicians, surgeons, and teachers in elementary or secondary schools, colleges, academies, or seminaries."

    The regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(3)(i) states that a petition for an advanced degree professional must be accompanied by:

    (A) An official academic record showing that the alien has an United States advanced degree or a foreign equivalent degree; or

    (B) An official academic record showing that the alien has a United States baccalaureate degree or a foreign equivalent degree, and evidence in the form of letters from current or former employer(s) showing that the alien has at least five years of progressive post-baccalaureate experience in the specialty.

    In addition, the regulation at 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(k)(4)(i) states, in part:

    The job offer portion of the individual labor certification, Schedule A application, or Pilot Program application must demonstrate that the job requires a professional holding an advanced degree or the equivalent or an alien of exceptional ability.

    In summary, a petition for an advanced degree professional must establish that the beneficiary is a member of the professions holding an advanced degree, and that the offered position requires, at a minimum, a professional holding an advanced degree. Specifically, for the offered position, the petitioner must establish that the labor certification requires no less than a U.S. academic or professional degree (or a foreign equivalent degree) above a baccalaureate, or a U.S. baccalaureate (or a foreign equivalent degree) followed by at least five years of progressive experience in the specialty. p. 4 In the instant case, Part H of the labor certification submitted with the petition states that the offered position has the following minimum requirements:

    H.4.

    H.5.

    H.6.

    H.8.

    H.8-A.

    H.8-B.

    H.8-C.

    H.9.

    H.10.

    H.14.

    Education: Bachelor's.

    Training: None required.

    Experience in the job offered: None required.

    Alternate combination of education and experience: Accepted.

    Other education accepted

    Acceptable level of education: Education combination equivalent to bachelor's degree.

    Number of years experience acceptable: 5 years.

    Foreign educational equivalent: Accepted.

    Experience in an alternate occupation: Accepted.

    Specific skills or other requirements: The requirements for the position will be a bachelor's degree in business, business administration, finance, computer science, engineering or related field, including three year bachelor degree combined with one year graduate diploma and five years of post-baccalaureate progressive experience as a business systems analyst, systems analyst, quality assurance analyst, software engineer or combination thereof. Relocation possible. Experience must include minimum two years working with MS SOL Server 2005 DB testing, Mainframe DB Testing, Oracle DB Testing, Win 2000, MS DOS, UNIX, C, Test Director/Quality Center,

    Selenium, QTP, VB Script. Will accept

    The petition is not currently approvable, however, because of certain issues that arose beyond the director's decision. Specifically, the evidence in the record does not indicate whether the petitioner has the continuing ability to pay the proffered wage as of the priority date. See 8 C.F.R. § 204.5(g)(2). According to USCIS records, the petitioner has filed over 300 Form I -129 and I -140 petitions on behalf of other beneficiaries including seven Form I-140 petitions filed in September 2011, the instant priority date, or thereafter. Accordingly, the petitioner must establish that it has had the continuing ability to pay the combined proffered wages to each beneficiary with a petition pending from the priority date of the instant petition onward. See Matter of Great Wall, 16 I&N Dec. 142, 144-145 (Acting Reg'l Comm'r 1977). The evidence in the record does not document the priority date, proffered wage or wages paid to each beneficiary, whether any of the other petitions have been withdrawn, revoked, or denied, or whether any of the other beneficiaries have obtained lawful permanent residence. In addition, it is noted that the director's decision finding that the labor certification does not require a member of the professions holding an advanced degree did not address whether or not the petitioner had the ability to pay the proffered wage from the priority date onwards. The AAO further notes that that